Gates to Donate $10B for Vaccines, But Will It Help?
(Jan. 29) -- In the largest donation yet by his private charitable foundation, Bill Gates has announced he'll donate $10 billion for the
development of new vaccines and their distribution in developing
countries.
"We must make this the decade of vaccines," Gates said in a
statement.
"Vaccines already save and improve millions of lives in developing
countries. Innovation will make it possible to save more children than
ever before."
Gates and his wife, Melinda, called upon
businesses and international governments to add to the contribution,
which they estimate could save the lives of 7.6 million children under
the age of 5 by 2019. Among the vaccines they hope to develop and
distribute are those for malaria and tuberculosis, ailments that have
been all but eradicated in the U.S. but still plague poorer nations.
The World Health Organization is enthusiastically behind the
initiative, with Margaret Chan, head of the WHO, calling it
"unprecedented."
Global health is one of the priorities of the
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, but this new donation eclipses its
average health-related donations of years past -- about $800 million
annually, which approaches the total yearly budget for the United
Nations' WHO.
The $10 billion donation is being lauded by the international community, but a 2007 investigation by the
Los Angeles Times
concluded that the Gates' international medical aid was actually
putting children at risk. At the time, efforts to fight AIDS,
tuberculosis and malaria led to highly specialized medical training and
a subsequent shortage of basic-care doctors. In turn, more children
died of common ailments like sepsis and diarrhea.
The
disproportionate focus on certain illnesses has also meant that
resources were diverted away from basic needs, like clean water and
food, which, ironically, are necessary for the proper digestion of AIDS
medications provided by the foundation's dollars.
And while
there's no doubt that more money, and more attention, are fundamentally
important in saving the lives of vulnerable children, health experts
have cautioned against over-celebrating large-scale donations like this
one.
Dr. Peter Poore, a pediatrician who works as a consultant
to the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI), one of the
overseas health operatives that's received Gates money in the past,
warned that overstating the impact of donor programs can actually stall
foreign health care. "They can also do dangerous things," he told the
Times. "They can be very disruptive to health systems -- the very
things they claim they are trying to improve."
No matter how
many vaccines the foundation pays for, its aid isn't sustainable unless
it also pays to train foreign doctors and equip a nation's hospitals
and medical centers. Dr. Tadataka Yamada, president of the Gates
Foundation's global health program, has said that its money can only be
"a catalyst" and urged African governments to fill the gaps. But with
even doctors in Africa succumbing to AIDS, the narrow focus of the
Gates Foundation might only compound the problem.
With an
endowment exceeding $35 billion, there's no doubt that Gates and his
family will be in the business of donations for years to come. Surely,
those billions will save lives. But with
a philanthropist
who advocates "recognition as an added incentive" for generosity,
here's hoping that countries on the receiving end can - somehow - do
what's needed behind the scenes to take that money and make sustainable
changes.
(Since vaccines kill and damage more people than the actual diseases, this is NOT helpful but dangerous.)