"Thank you for this great post"
Arise and Shine
Court orders google to block news and taking away our freedom of the press, lest we be forewarned of US treachery
Posted by: "Stephen DArbeau" stephen_darbeau
Sun Oct 26, 2008 6:41 pm (PDT)
Please pay attention to this please. I recently sent out some information about troops being deployed here from Iraq. These are combat troops.This is not to alarm anyone just to remember to be vigilant. Now as they are probably reading my mail they know that the internet knows.This could be the start of something that will coincide with other developments. Ok people find those troops. I believe they are 101st Airborne redeployed here for crowd control. Spokesman from Future Operations in the Pentagon denies that they are here for crowd control as was previously stated. They are here though. The question is why you have armed combat troops on US soil? And under whose orders. This administration is not done yet.
Court Orders Google Block News
Journalism banned by US judges from Google - Banned writings of
political refugee, US dissident Dr Les Sachs (Leslie Sachs)
by Dan Hajidah
www. geocities.com/walberg2002/
US federal judges have begun taking direct political control of
Google and the internet search engines, serving (apparently illegal)
orders on Google and Yahoo and others, to block important non-US
journalism sites which discuss US corruption.
This article will show how to access a number of these important
articles and a free online book, still available on international web
servers, but which Google and the search engines are not allowed to
display in search results.
The world is deceived to think 'everything is searchable on Google',
when Google has now fallen under direct political control of US
judges, Google ordered to hide significant sites of political
journalism critical of the US regime.
Google and Yahoo have accepted these orders from US judges to block
numerous writings, and to help attack the journalist, political
refugee and US dissident Dr Les Sachs (Dr Leslie Sachs), despite
potential harm or even political assassination, that may result from
these websites being banned from search results.
The journalism blocked from Google, discusses corruption among US
federal judges themselves, and how US high judges and certain lawyers
support the Bush family and the ruling US elite - and this apparently
makes US lawyers and organisations so afraid, that many US lawyers
fear even to comment about the core facts of the case.
US lawyers have privately expressed fear of being disbarred or
otherwise harmed, or targeted with smear campaigns like Dr Sachs
himself, if any US lawyer would dare to request that these banning
orders be declared null and void.
This is a very chilling and disturbing as well as historic legal
matter, soon to be litigated in the courts of Great Britain.
There is evidence, and a lengthy court filing, indicating that Dr Les
Sachs is under threat of assassination backed by the US regime, with
US judges at the centre of the threats against him.
Google and Yahoo are accepting orders to block the websites by which
Dr Sachs was defending himself, and which provide details regarding
these apparent threats to murder him, including evidence of attacks
on him in Europe by US agents and other parties tied to the Bush
family.
It seems that Google and Yahoo are thus being turned into US
instruments for hiding and obscuring key information about political
crimes, and thus are becoming tools by which US dissidents might more
easily be extinguished.
The murder of a US dissident can be anonymous and successful, if the
fact that the dissident was threatened with murder, is itself blocked
from Google and the internet search engines, while corporate media
slanders and smears are spread against the target, to deceive about
his life or his potential death.
- And that seems to be what is
happening in this affair.
The fear of US lawyers for their own safety, if they dare to act
against orders they recognise as clearly illegal, further confirms
the aspect of political terror here.
The political refugee from the US Dr Les Sachs (Dr Leslie Sachs),
published many important pieces on the web in 2004-2007 after he took
asylum in Europe, after being banned and, according to a court
filing, apparently threatened with political murder instead the
United States.
In 2007, the US judges - the same group of judges named in Dr Sachs'
journalism and previous court filings - held an in absentia 'legal
proceeding' against this journalist refugee in Europe, with the
object that now, most of Dr Sachs' writings, and even his auto-
biography, are banned from Google and the major search engines.
It seems this is the only method the US judges could use to suppress
these writings, of the dissident US journalist and critic of the
courts, who had escaped beyond their clutches.
US-UK corporate media assisted the US judges, with a media campaign
mis-representing the issues in the case, and hiding the nature of the
journalism being banned.
These media attacks against Dr Sachs have
dominated the internet after the blocking and banning of Dr Sachs'
journalism.
However, the media attacks are now in process of being withdrawn, as
media companies have realized they are liable in Europe for their
deceptions about what material was banned and why it was banned.
The banned writings are significant.
They are valued by many people
in the US underground as well as readers around the world.
Though
blocked from being shown on Google, links to these articles are being
passed around by samizdat techniques, in e-mail newsletters among US
resistance groups.
These writings have also found favour, by readers
as far away from the US as China and Australia, and many other
nations as well.
There is a legal case upcoming in Great Britain regarding:
- these apparently illegal US bans on Google and Yahoo, and other
search engines, preventing them from listing these journalism sites
in search engine results;
- evidence of US government extortion and threats of murder against
Dr Les Sachs, including evidence of extensive court fraud in the two
US 'legal proceedings' to ban this man's writing;
- what is described in the legal filings as the largest global media
smear campaign of libel and lies ever conducted against a political
refugee.
US judges have issued an ongoing series of 'orders' to block from
Google, any new attempts by Dr Les Sachs to defend himself in
writing, as the US judges try to ensure the Internet is dominated by
negative material against their target.
Meanwhile, US and UK media companies tied to a friend of Bush, or in
a position to benefit from favour from US judges - and also, very
sadly, Wikipedia - had mounted aggressive attacks Dr Les Sachs,
creating the quite large internet deceptions about the material that
is being banned.
Many other people on the web, have repeated the false material in an
escalating cycle, or posted or e-mailed abuse about Dr Sachs after
reading Wikipedia or some other tainted source.
This is now
moderating in recent weeks, as some of the corporate media material
attacking Dr Sachs has been withdrawn by media companies who are
trying, belatedly, to minimize their liabilities.
After all, to assist any government, even the US government, in
helping to possibly murder a dissident journalist, is technically a
crime of 'terrorism'.
It is still a crime of 'terrorism' if it is the
USA regime itself who is guilty.
Now, European investigators, who are not under the thumb of the US or
UK companies or the US government, are currently preparing better
journalism about this case, in contrast to the quite misleading
articles which have been on the web.
Journalists are now examining
the proof documents, that no US journalist has so far wished to see.
Proof documents from the upcoming UK court case, will soon be going
online.
Extensive interviews are underway with Dr Sachs and his
people, and also with the various media companies and lawyers and US
government officials involved in attacks against him and in the
banning of his writings.
In the meantime, it is suggested that one read the text of the e-mail
below, "Correcting the internet lies told about Dr Les Sachs (Dr
Leslie Sachs) and about the legal cases involving Patricia Cornwell",
and contrast this with any material currently visible on the web.
For those who wish to investigate on their own, in addition to the
web journalism as can be seen on the banned website below, Dr Sachs
makes available thousands of pages of evidence files which will be
submitted in the British courts, to anyone who will cover the copying
and shipping.
The banned-and-blocked websites of Dr Sachs, as can be found below,
contain links to contact Dr Sachs, who welcomes public enquiries.
How to access the banned journalism of Dr Les Sachs:
It is important to note that the orders against Google and the search
engines, include orders to ban web pages that even dare to link to Dr
Sachs, so be sure to avoid placing any direct html link if you
discuss Dr Sachs' writing on the web.
- Even this web page you are
reading might be blocked from Google and the search engines, if a
direct link was placed here.
There are several websites with the banned material, but you can
reach all of them via the main website of Dr Les Sachs in Belgium:
www (point) dr-les-sachs (point) be (Do NOT put as direct link, or
this page may be blocked!)
Note that the domain suffix is 'be' (for Belgium) instead of 'com',
and those are hyphens within the web address, rather than underscores.
Also, US residents take note, that residents of the USA who have
tried to write or blog in a positive way about Dr Sachs, have
reported direct intimidation by lawyers connected to the friends of
President Bush, with suggestions to remove the material, or else face
a fate perhaps similar to Dr Sachs.
As it seems that US lawyers are too frightened to represent Dr Sachs
or to oppose the banning of his writings, US lawyers may also be too
afraid to assist anyone in the US who is intimidated for trying to
speak positively about him.
So, to protect yourself, do consider the dangers if you are inside
United States territory, before you comment publicly against the
attackers of Dr Sachs.
List of major writings of Dr Les Sachs, banned and blocked from
Google and the search engines:
From the main page of Dr Les Sachs' website as above, links are
provided near the top of the main page there, to a number of these
banned-and-blocked writings.
The banning orders served upon Google and the search engines, are not
always in perfect operation, as various people continue to try and
link and suggest Dr Sachs' banned journalism, so sometimes the banned
material does pop up in search results.
Also, Dr Sachs allows all of his website journalism and content to be
freely republished by anyone, under the broadest kind of 'Creative
Commons' licence, and some people have been republishing the banned-
and-blocked material, trying to make it visible in other places.
Here, a list of the major important journalism pieces by Dr Les Sachs
read and passed around by others.
Amid the evidence to be submitted
in the British courts, are hundreds of e-mails from people, attesting
to how valuable this journalism has been to many people's lives,
especially victims or families of victims of the US legal system.
From this list of the banned-and-blocked journalism of Dr Sachs, you
can already see evidence of falsehood of the US-UK media articles
which attacked Dr Sachs.
- Those articles often suggest that the
banning of Dr Sachs' journalism, was principally 'harassment'
or 'cyberstalking' of the Bush family friend, political financier and
right-wing author Patricia Cornwell.
But as you can see, most of the banned journalism is not even about
this Patricia Cornwell.
And the biography of Patricia Cornwell that
was banned - the biography that was labelled by US judges as
allegedly 'cyberstalking' - is itself backed by a bibliography of
other suppressed articles - a bibliography which the US judges also
banned - and by a set of evidence files, establishing substantial if
not complete truth for the banned biography.
It appears on the face of things, that the 'harassment of Cornwell'
story broadcast by corporate media companies, was a deceptive ruse to
try and discredit a journalist with a wide-ranging critique of US
judicial corruption, who had become a significant figure in the US
resistance movements.
Just below, a list of the banned-and-blocked journalism of Dr Les
Sachs, free for anyone to republish, via links at the banned-and-
blocked website above, as Dr Sachs says, "What the USA is now
illegally trying to block the world from finding on the internet":
The "Complete Underground Guide and FAQ, to US Judicial and Legal
Corruption" (free online book)
"America's Corrupt Legal System - Danger to Visitors, Travellers as
Well as USA Residents"
"Americans Murdering Their Judges, and the American Crisis of
Judicial Corruption"
An article that perhaps changed the US Supreme Court, possibly
blocking J.
Harvie Wilkinson III from becoming Chief Justice: "Judge
J.
Harvie Wilkinson III, His Bribery Cover-Up for 4th Circuit Judges
and Bush Friend Patricia Cornwell"
Detailed Biography of Dr Les Sachs - the banned story of how the US
regime and Bush judges forced Dr Sachs to become a political refugee
in Europe
"The CIA and Wikipedia" - Wikipedia and Answers-com, described as
tools of US government disinformation
The Banned Biography - "The True Early Life and Career of Author
Patricia Cornwell: Crimes & Scandals of a Friend of Bush, Anti-
Semite, and Far-Right Political Financier"
(Note: Lawyers for Patricia Cornwell are currently being extensively
queried about the above biography of their client.
It appears that
Cornwell's lawyers now do not attempt to deny that this biography is
fact-based and truthful, even though they were able to induce US
judges to ban it from Google and the search engines as part of their
2007 efforts to silence Dr Sachs.
On the sidebar of this biography of Patricia Cornwell, there is also
a link to a banned "Bibliography of articles about Patricia Cornwell
that the media are now trying to hide from you", media articles about
Cornwell that were generally suppressed from the internet after 1998,
in what appears as if some sort of implicit 'agreement' among the
media companies, Cornwell and the US political elite.
Most of Dr Sachs' banned biography of Cornwell, is supported by the
articles in the banned 'Bibliography' .
These print media articles now
largely excluded from the internet, but can be secured more
laboriously in print or photocopy versions.
)
More banned-and-blocked writing of Dr Sachs that can be found via the
banned website above:
"Footsteps of Anne Frank": US writer of Jewish heritage forced to
take political refuge in Europe
US Appeals Court filing of 3 April 2004 - composed in hiding inside
the US, before Dr Sachs escaped over the border - An 125-count court
filing served up as high as the Supreme Court of the United States,
but apparently never answered, detailing alleged crimes of US federal
judges with Bush's financier friend Patricia Cornwell
Once again, to access the above writings,
There are several websites with the banned material, but you can
reach all of them via the main website of Dr Les Sachs in Belgium:
www (point) dr-les-sachs (point) be (Do NOT put as direct link, or
this page may be blocked!)
Note that the domain suffix is 'be' (for Belgium) instead of 'com',
and those are hyphens within the web address, rather than underscores.
Also, journalism of Dr Les Sachs on MWC News:
An alternative news service based in Canada, MWC News ("Media with
Conscience") , has been brave enough to continue to publish several
articles from Dr Sachs despite the intimidation of the rather large
media attack campaign conducted against Dr Sachs during 2007.
The
online MWC articles of Dr Sachs are as follows:
"Foreign Companies Face Risk of US Court Corruption: Doing Business
in the Big Bribery Nation"
"US Government Attacks on Jews, versus the Power of the US 'Jewish
Lobby'"
"BBC Showing
Saddam Snuff Video - The Darkest Propaganda Game of All"
Before believing other material about Dr Sachs on the internet - an
alternative viewpoint
There is little accurate journalism on the web yet about the eight-
year-old battle of Patricia Cornwell to silence Dr Les Sachs, because
the US-UK media companies that published many articles, mostly in
2007, were largely tied to Cornwell herself and her far-flung
publishing operation, even a law professor working for Cornwell's
publisher Pearson.
None of these companies wished to look at Dr Sachs' proof documents,
and the media producing these articles not only largely avoided
interviewing Dr Sachs, in some cases they refused all communications
with him.
It should be noted again, that the US and UK corporate media have now
begun a process of withdrawing previously published articles which
were attacking Dr Sachs.
Comprehensive interviews are now being conducted in anticipation of
the upcoming legal proceeding in Britain, including detailed
evaluation of the proof documents, and interview questions served on
all parties, with ample opportunity for all parties to respond.
Pending more thorough journalism on this matter, here is a statement
from Dr Les Sachs, which may be usefully contrasted with other
internet presentations on the topic.
It is suggested that readers
would read below, and glance at Dr Sachs' banned websites, before
accepting at face value some other internet 'summary' claiming to
portray this controversy.
The following was received by e-mail from Dr Sachs, and represents
his own point of view - Dr Sachs himself invites contact, e-mail is
via a link at his (banned) website as described above, or also below
at the bottom:
Correcting the internet lies told about Dr Les Sachs (Dr Leslie
Sachs) and about the legal cases involving Patricia Cornwell -
A statement by Dr Les Sachs
Many of the things, indeed most everything, that you read on the
internet about me, and about the Patricia Cornwell legal cases in the
US, are a lie and a fraud, and the lies and fraud will be brought out
in an upcoming legal case in a few months in the UK.
Thousands of pages of proof documents which show that what I have
been saying is true, will be entered into the record in the UK
courts. Most of these documents are available to anyone.
As we get closer to the UK court date, media companies have begun to
pull back and withdraw some of the stories telling lies about me.
But
many of the lies still remain.
The US judges have illegally banned from Google and the search
engines, nearly all of my own articles and journalism, but also most
articles that link to me or which tell the truth about me.
- The US
government and judges, believe that my journalism is such a threat to
them, that they need to take direct political control of Google and
the search engines, to try and erase my writings, and to make it
easier for me to be murdered.
It is because I am such an important dissident and critic of the US
regime - because my writings have touched many thousands of families
hurt by the US legal system - that the US judges and government, and
the US-UK media companies, have joined to ban my words, and have
joined in what UK legal papers call the largest smear campaign of
lies ever conducted against a political refugee.
That is why they have banned my journalism from the internet.
Most of
the articles and journalism they have banned, are not even about
Patsy Cornwell - The journalism they have banned, is mostly about the
corruption of US judges and lawyers and media companies.
Though the case was started, in order to silence and block me from
writing journalism about the political financier Cornwell, about her
crimes with the Bushes and her crimes with US judges.
Because I hold proof of serious crimes by US federal judges, US
lawyers were afraid to help me.
US lawyers are often disbarred if
they dare to say a word to help a victim of the judges' hatred.
First, some true things about me, that most internet articles hide
from you -
- The threats to jail and murder me by the US judges and government,
forced me to be a political refugee from the US.
I escaped to safety
in Europe in 2004, and I am now an EU citizen.
- In the US, the judges banned my freedom of speech instantly, in a
phone call from the federal judge, minutes after I received the legal
papers.
No trial, no hearing, no nothing, just an illegal deal
arranged in advance by the corrupt Willcox & Savage firm, lawyers for
Bush's friend Cornwell, in a deal with a judge appointed by Bush.
-
Apparently the only such case in US history, instant banning of
journalism and freedom of speech, advance injunction without trial or
hearing.
- They used the ban on my speaking, to threaten to torture me to
death in a US jail cell, and to stage a brief Stalin-style 'legal
proceeding', with me banned from denouncing it as a fraud.
- Friends of the US judge pretended to be my lawyers.
While
threatening to have me tortured and killed, these lawyers signing
fake papers claiming I "agreed" to ban my freedom of speech for the
rest of my life, plus "agreed" to spend the rest of my life paying
money to the judge's friends.
These friends of the judge, also
pretended to be part of a 'Freedom Works Foundation' which doesn't
exist, and even put this fraud in writing.
- Patricia Cornwell is a friend of the Bush family for 25 years.
When
the first Bush was President, they made Cornwell into a 'famous
author' as a way for media companies to funnel millions back to the
Bush family.
- Cornwell has been a special 'friend of the judges' since 1998.
Media companies at that time also agreed to begin to hide the real
facts of Cornwell's life, and to join the US judges to help destroy
anyone who writes truth about her.
- Cornwell threatened to destroy the books of a Jew, in writing, and
then committed perjury about it.
It is Cornwell's threats of book-
burning against a Jew, that started the public controversy between
myself and Cornwell.
- Cornwell publicly boasted in Vanity Fair magazine that she can get
away with murdering people, and I am one of the people she has
enjoyed threatening to murder.
- In 2007, after three years of my journalism about US court
corruption, the same US judges who threatened to kill me and who
forced me to become a refugee in Europe, these same judges held a new
fake 'trial', in part to smear me with brand new lies claiming I was
a 'stalker' of Bush's friend Cornwell, but mostly in order to issue
illegal orders upon Google and the search engines, to ban most of my
journalism from the internet, so people cannot find my writings.
- The majority of my writing banned from the internet, is not even
about Cornwell, it is rather about the corrupt US legal system and
judges.
These banned writings have been important to tens of
thousands of people.
The US government seeks to have me silenced and
murdered to prevent this journalism being more widely known.
Some big lies and hoaxes about me, that you find on the internet -
- The lie that the case is about 'plagiarism'
I never used this word in accusations about my writing and
Cornwell's.
The fake story about 'plagiarism' is a set of words
shoved into my mouth, to distract from the facts about Cornwell's
threats of book-burning a Jew's books, Cornwell then hiring people to
extort me and threaten to kill me, and to illegally ban my journalism
and freedom of speech.
- The 'sticker on my book' discussed in news
articles, spoke only of Cornwell's book-burning threats, not
about 'plagiarism' .
- The lie that I am a 'stalker' or 'cyber-stalker' harassing Cornwell
From 2004-2007 I published three years of factual journalism about
Cornwell and the US judges, proven by documents, and totally
unchallenged by Cornwell's lawyers.
- Then, Cornwell's new corrupt
lawyers at Morris & Morris in Richmond, and their partner corrupt
lawyers at WilmerHale in Boston, just invented fake 'stalker' stories
out of thin air, and spread these false stories through media
companies tied to Cornwell and the US government.
Today, Cornwell's
lawyers don't even deny the stalking charges are fake, because
the 'stalking' stories Cornwell has invented are literally
impossible - Cornwell says I have been sneaking back into the USA,
somehow evading Homeland Security at the borders, just to 'stalk'
her, and then I am able to sneak back to Europe, ha!
- The lie that I "agreed" to ban my own freedom of speech as
a "settlement"
I have been an anti-corruption book author and journalist since the
early 1980s.
- The written order banning my freedom of speech for the
rest of my life, is a clear fraud, only signed by the judge's
friends, not by me.
- I had no assets to lose by going to trial or
appealing illegal orders.
- No one in the Cornwell gang can explain
why I had any reason to quickly "agree" to ban my own freedom of
speech and journalism for the rest of my life, plus "agree" to have
my publishing company and reputation destroyed, plus "agree" to spend
the rest of my life paying several hundred thousand dollars to the
judge's friends with their fake 'civil rights foundation' that
doesn't exist.
- These lawyers even joked, on the written court
record, about threatening to murder me, and about conspiring with the
federal judge to pose as my lawyer while they were really working for
Cornwell. - Yes, ha, very funny.
- The Cornwell group has also
circulated fake 'apology letters' created by Cornwell's lawyers.
- The lie that my journalism is for 'marketing' my books, or that I
am 'jealous' of Cornwell
This is more absurdity.
The initial claim of Cornwell and that the
judges is that there is nothing wrong with threatening to burn a
Jew's books, and that I was only saying this to 'market' my own
writing, thus I must be banned and suppressed.
They claim that US
judges can ban any independent journalism, merely by declaring that
the journalist is 'marketing' and selling his writing.
- They claim
that I am only showing proof documents of how they illegally banned
my journalism, of how they committed court fraud and threatened to
murder me, of how they destroyed my publishing career, how they
forced me to become a political refugee in Europe to save my life -
just because I am engaged in 'marketing' or 'jealous'. Yeah, sure.
- The lie that Cornwell doesn't hate Jews
Documents and witnesses prove that Patricia Cornwell really does hate
the people she describes as "dirty, filthy Jews".
Cornwell grew up
under the foster care supervision of Billy Graham, whose anti-Semitic
hatred was recorded on the Watergate tapes.
Like some Nazis, Cornwell
likes using submissive Jews for business, or in her eroticism.
Cornwell's gay marriage to a Jewish woman seems a political fake,
taken under legal advice, to cover for crimes: Victims of Cornwell
have had swastikas painted on houses, Cornwell's friends record her
hatred of 'filthy Jews', and Cornwell did, in writing, threaten a
book-burning of the books of a Jew, and then paid people to threaten
murder to cover up for this.
Internet media sources are mostly tied to Cornwell -
Do note how many internet "sources" turn out to be Patricia
Cornwell's own publishing companies or others with a vested interest
in her crimes.
CNN is a branch of one of Cornwell's publishing companies, Time-
Warner Books.
AP (Associated Press) is partly owned by Cornwell's publishing
companies, and by parties named as co-defendants of Cornwell in past-
crimes (Times-Dispatch Media General).
David Mehegan, Boston Globe (New York Times Company) sent me hate
mail, does not deny taking a bribe from Cornwell's Boston lawyer Joan
Lukey.
The UK Guardian is in joint financial projects with Cornwell's
publishers at Pearson and elsewhere.
Media General - Times Dispatch editorial board had a personal meeting
with Cornwell, agreeing to help her in any way whatsoever, due to the
money she gives the Bushes.
US law prof.
Roy Girasa, works for Cornwell's publisher Pearson,
doesn't deny he took money to write lies for Cornwell.
Wikipedia and Answers-com are defendants in the UK legal case, facing
possible closure, they have a vested interested in supporting the
banning of my journalism and the threats to murder me, after they
worked with Cornwell and the CIA to spread lies about me for several
years.
Wikipedia's UK spokesman David Gerard has sent me personal
hate mail, telling me how he is working to destroy me.
Media companies that operate in the US fear revenge by US judges in
future cases, if they expose crimes by the judges - media companies
want favours from US judges, so they help the US judges to attack and
smear critics of the courts.
The US federal judges, anxious to cover up for their court fraud
crimes, as partners of Cornwell and Bush, of course wrote extensive
public lies and smears about me as part of their illegal 'court
orders', while banning my responses and my websites from Google and
the search engines.
Patricia Cornwell has spread lies about me to readers of her books,
encouraging them to spread smears about me on the internet, while her
judge friends ban my replies from being visible on Google and the
search engines.
And of course you have various other people who never contacted me,
writing their own false material on the internet, based on lies
originally written by the Cornwell team or the Cornwell judges, and
spread through Cornwell's media connections above.
Feel free to share or publish the above with anyone you wish.
(Note that on the internet my name might be given either as Dr Les
Sachs, also Dr Leslie Sachs - people sell used copies of my old
published books on Amazon or Half-dot-com usually under the
name 'Leslie Sachs').
Dr Les Sachs
website:
www (dot) dr-les-sachs (dot) be (Do NOT put as direct link, or this
page may be blocked!)
(The above e-mail received from Dr Les Sachs, is the conclusion of
this article.
)
-- Dan Hajidah
- About Dan Hajidah -
Abdan "Dan" Hajidah is a contract researcher for journalists at
European news agencies.
He has supplied documented source material to
journalists at leading news sources in Europe.
Dan shares most of his time among several countries of Northern
Europe - Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium and Sweden.
Dan is particularly interested in the role of progressive Muslim
culture in modern European life, and issues of freedom of expression
that affect the Muslim community.
Dan can be reached by e-mail at: dh-news @ europe.com
===
US Government Attacks on Jews
Versus the Power of the US "Jewish Lobby"
Political Views
By Dr Les Sachs
http://mwcnews.net/content/view/12782/254/
Anti-semitic attacks by Bush's friends and the US government? - But
what about the "powerful US Jewish lobby" backing "total US support
for Israel"?
As people read my writings, and learn about the anti-semitic attacks
on me by Bush's friends and some Jew-hating US judges, I often get
comments or questions along these lines -
"It's hard to believe the anti-semite angle given all the protection
the US and Bush are known for giving Israel, and the power of the
Jewish lobby in the United States - So how is it possible that you
can be the victim of anti-semitic attacks, and be forced to leave the
US and take refuge in Europe, when it seems like the Jewish lobby
would have jumped in eagerly to protect you?"
Very sadly, it shows the power of propaganda, that this kind of
question ends up being asked.
The reality - which Jews themselves know well - is that Jews are
often afraid to help Jewish victims of government attacks, because
Jews everywhere, even wealthy Jews in the US, tend to be very afraid
of the world around them.
Today in the US, as in much of history,
Jews will cower behind the curtains of one house, when the
authorities come to attack and destroy the Jews next door.
Moreover, some Jews will even rob and betray other Jews, as well as
abandon them and refuse to help them.
Every nation, society or tribe
has its quislings, who are ready to betray their fellows.
Jews are no
different.
People speak of the power of the "Jewish lobby" to denote the
political figures maintaining the connections between the US military-
industrial complex and the Israeli government.
There are indeed Jews
who are prominent alongside Bush and other US politicians, there are
Jews who work for the US government system, and other Jews who
collaborate with it - just as many people of all backgrounds
collaborate with the US regime.
But there are also Jews who really take the rebellious Jewish
heritage seriously, Jews who dare to speak out, and such Jews can
find themselves much hated by the US rulers, exactly because they can
be effective voices against the fascism and denial of human rights in
the US.
Jews can be very powerful if they point out Nazi-like
behaviour among the US ruling class.
Such people of Jewish heritage,
are the kind of Jews that the US would like to see silenced,
marginalised, or banned, and if they don't keep quiet, even killed
and exterminated.
There are already political Jews being murdered in US jail cells,
people of Jewish heritage attacked by the US government (like myself)
who can't get help from Jewish lawyers or organizations.
And that is
all hidden beneath the surface of stories about the "all-powerful
Jewish lobby" and "military support for Israel".
Consider the theory of the "powerful Jewish lobby" as showing its
strength in the US military backing of the government of Israel.
This
theory needs to be analysed - and actually, as will be shown below,
this theory is rather a kind of reverse mirror of a more complex and
more frightening truth.
But even if you take the "powerful Jewish lobby" theory at face
value, you can see how the "powerful Jewish organisations" might want
to still keep silent about the attack and killing of individual
Jewish people, ESPECIALLY when it is the US government attacking a
Jew.
Jews might well be afraid to damage that precious "military support
for Israel".
They may think it necessary to stay quiet about innocent
Jews getting attacked or murdered by the US government, as
a "necessary sacrifice" for the larger scheme of things.
And the whole prominent program of "US military support for Israel"
is the perfect cover story - it actually makes the US an ideal place
to attack and kill Jews, because "no one will believe it".
In today's world, as with any other victim, so long as the attack on
a Jew is not trumpeted in the mass corporate media, on CNN or the BBC
or by the "major" Jewish organisations, an attack on a Jew may well
remain nearly anonymous.
A Jew today can be murdered in near-silence,
like so many other victims in today's tragic world.
I myself have heard from victims, such as family of a political Jew
quietly killed in US jail cells.
There is no "big media" telling
their story, and so their stories remain, like much of the truth
today, hidden from most of the world.
The "Jewish lobby" - different from the "Christian lobby", the "Saudi
lobby" etc.
?
Let's go back and look again at the basic question asked above -
"It's hard to believe the anti-semite angle given all the protection
the US and Bush are known for giving Israel, and the power of the
Jewish lobby in the United States - So how is it possible that you
can be the victim of anti-semitic attacks, and be forced to leave the
US and take refuge in Europe, when it seems like the Jewish lobby
would have jumped in eagerly to protect you?"
As one reflects on this question, one realises it's actually a bit
silly.
The assumption behind this inquiry - an assumption that is
itself the creation of anti-semitic propaganda - is the mistake of
thinking of "the Jews" as some kind of monolithic bloc all together -
the Jews in Israel along with the Jews "running America", etc.
Actually, Jews in Israel and in the US are not just very diverse, but
extremely divided.
Jews are extremely contentious, and hardly united at all.
Many Jews
scorn the whole lot of Israeli politicians.
Many Jews would like
immediate, unrestricted peace negotiations, and quick comprehensive
peace agreements, between Israel and the Palestinians and all
neighbouring states.
Both around the world and inside Israel itself, there are a
significant number of religious Jews who think the state of Israel
should not even exist, unless the Messiah himself were to establish
it.
Despite the drumbeats of an upcoming Iran-Israel military
conflict, there are tens of thousands of Jews content to live in
Iran, and there are other Jews who travel to Tehran to express their
compliments to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
It is important to digest all of this - the real diversity of the
Jewish and Israeli peoples, versus the corporate media focus on the
US-Israeli government powers.
The knee-jerk thinking, about the monolithic Jewish bloc, is really
the end-product of all those anti-semitic stories of "rich Jews
always working together and trying to take over the world".
But in
reality, Israel today has an enormous chunk of its population in
poverty, a shameful gap between rich and poor - and there are many
poor Jews in the US as well as around the planet.
Here's another way to look at the question we are analysing, about
the "power of the Jewish lobby".
Imagine the case of a US citizen of
white Christian Protestant heritage, who is also a victim of US legal
and political corruption, who has been attacked by the US government.
Would anyone think of saying to this person:
"I really doubt your story of US legal corruption . . .
After all,
aren't those judges and lawyers and politicians you criticise, other
American white Christians, just like your own heritage? Isn't the US
government totally controlled by white Christians - like Bush and
most US senators and judges? So how could they be attacking YOU?"
One of the "most powerful lobbies" in Washington is indeed the lobby
of well-funded Christians - does that stop the US government from
attacking people who take Christian principles seriously?
Has the "powerful Christian lobby" stopped the US government from
allowing the attacks upon, and practical extermination of, Christian
communities in Iraq? - The "Christian lobby" says very little about
these events, and doesn't do much to help these Christian victims -
and yet Washington is full of famous Christian preachers with lots of
money, who are often at the White House or in Congress speaking
directly with US leaders.
Another "powerful lobby" is that of Saudi Arabia, the country that is
the very guardian of the central holy places of Islam, a
lobby "extremely influential" in Washington, and very close to the
Bushes - does that stop the US government from attacking and jailing
Muslims without trial and taking all of their rights away, from
making war on much of the Islamic world, and from bashing Muslims on
a regular basis in US rhetoric?
One of the most powerful people in Washington under Bush, Attorney
General Alberto R.
Gonzales, is from a Mexican family; he has been a
friend and adviser to Bush for many years - Does that stop the US
government from attacking and bashing Mexicans?
One of the most powerful people in the entire world is President
Bush's Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, a black woman - Does
that stop the US regime from destroying black communities and jailing
more black people than any other nation in the world?
President Bush's friend Patricia Cornwell is a multi-millionaire
lesbian who brings her lesbian girlfriends to party at President
Bush's Kennebunkport estate, while giving Bush and various senators
millions of dollars in gifts and campaign money.
US Vice President
Cheney's daughter is lesbian, and President Bush has often had a gay
prostitute at the White House (Jeff Gannon - James Guckert), with
Bush himself commonly thought to be a bi-sexual - Does that all stop
the US government, or even the Bush crowd, from attacking and bashing
gay people as part of their political programme?
So despite the "Jewish lobby" associated with the US defence industry
and politicians, why is it somehow "surprising" that US officials
would also attack Jews, as they also attack all of the above
categories of people, too - while every one of them also
has "powerful representatives" close to President Bush and the other
US rulers?
Sun Oct 26, 2008 6:41 pm (PDT)
Please pay attention to this please. I recently sent out some information about troops being deployed here from Iraq. These are combat troops.This is not to alarm anyone just to remember to be vigilant. Now as they are probably reading my mail they know that the internet knows.This could be the start of something that will coincide with other developments. Ok people find those troops. I believe they are 101st Airborne redeployed here for crowd control. Spokesman from Future Operations in the Pentagon denies that they are here for crowd control as was previously stated. They are here though. The question is why you have armed combat troops on US soil? And under whose orders. This administration is not done yet.
Court Orders Google Block News
Journalism banned by US judges from Google - Banned writings of
political refugee, US dissident Dr Les Sachs (Leslie Sachs)
by Dan Hajidah
www. geocities.com/walberg2002/
US federal judges have begun taking direct political control of
Google and the internet search engines, serving (apparently illegal)
orders on Google and Yahoo and others, to block important non-US
journalism sites which discuss US corruption.
This article will show how to access a number of these important
articles and a free online book, still available on international web
servers, but which Google and the search engines are not allowed to
display in search results.
The world is deceived to think 'everything is searchable on Google',
when Google has now fallen under direct political control of US
judges, Google ordered to hide significant sites of political
journalism critical of the US regime.
Google and Yahoo have accepted these orders from US judges to block
numerous writings, and to help attack the journalist, political
refugee and US dissident Dr Les Sachs (Dr Leslie Sachs), despite
potential harm or even political assassination, that may result from
these websites being banned from search results.
The journalism blocked from Google, discusses corruption among US
federal judges themselves, and how US high judges and certain lawyers
support the Bush family and the ruling US elite - and this apparently
makes US lawyers and organisations so afraid, that many US lawyers
fear even to comment about the core facts of the case.
US lawyers have privately expressed fear of being disbarred or
otherwise harmed, or targeted with smear campaigns like Dr Sachs
himself, if any US lawyer would dare to request that these banning
orders be declared null and void.
This is a very chilling and disturbing as well as historic legal
matter, soon to be litigated in the courts of Great Britain.
There is evidence, and a lengthy court filing, indicating that Dr Les
Sachs is under threat of assassination backed by the US regime, with
US judges at the centre of the threats against him.
Google and Yahoo are accepting orders to block the websites by which
Dr Sachs was defending himself, and which provide details regarding
these apparent threats to murder him, including evidence of attacks
on him in Europe by US agents and other parties tied to the Bush
family.
It seems that Google and Yahoo are thus being turned into US
instruments for hiding and obscuring key information about political
crimes, and thus are becoming tools by which US dissidents might more
easily be extinguished.
The murder of a US dissident can be anonymous and successful, if the
fact that the dissident was threatened with murder, is itself blocked
from Google and the internet search engines, while corporate media
slanders and smears are spread against the target, to deceive about
his life or his potential death.
- And that seems to be what is
happening in this affair.
The fear of US lawyers for their own safety, if they dare to act
against orders they recognise as clearly illegal, further confirms
the aspect of political terror here.
The political refugee from the US Dr Les Sachs (Dr Leslie Sachs),
published many important pieces on the web in 2004-2007 after he took
asylum in Europe, after being banned and, according to a court
filing, apparently threatened with political murder instead the
United States.
In 2007, the US judges - the same group of judges named in Dr Sachs'
journalism and previous court filings - held an in absentia 'legal
proceeding' against this journalist refugee in Europe, with the
object that now, most of Dr Sachs' writings, and even his auto-
biography, are banned from Google and the major search engines.
It seems this is the only method the US judges could use to suppress
these writings, of the dissident US journalist and critic of the
courts, who had escaped beyond their clutches.
US-UK corporate media assisted the US judges, with a media campaign
mis-representing the issues in the case, and hiding the nature of the
journalism being banned.
These media attacks against Dr Sachs have
dominated the internet after the blocking and banning of Dr Sachs'
journalism.
However, the media attacks are now in process of being withdrawn, as
media companies have realized they are liable in Europe for their
deceptions about what material was banned and why it was banned.
The banned writings are significant.
They are valued by many people
in the US underground as well as readers around the world.
Though
blocked from being shown on Google, links to these articles are being
passed around by samizdat techniques, in e-mail newsletters among US
resistance groups.
These writings have also found favour, by readers
as far away from the US as China and Australia, and many other
nations as well.
There is a legal case upcoming in Great Britain regarding:
- these apparently illegal US bans on Google and Yahoo, and other
search engines, preventing them from listing these journalism sites
in search engine results;
- evidence of US government extortion and threats of murder against
Dr Les Sachs, including evidence of extensive court fraud in the two
US 'legal proceedings' to ban this man's writing;
- what is described in the legal filings as the largest global media
smear campaign of libel and lies ever conducted against a political
refugee.
US judges have issued an ongoing series of 'orders' to block from
Google, any new attempts by Dr Les Sachs to defend himself in
writing, as the US judges try to ensure the Internet is dominated by
negative material against their target.
Meanwhile, US and UK media companies tied to a friend of Bush, or in
a position to benefit from favour from US judges - and also, very
sadly, Wikipedia - had mounted aggressive attacks Dr Les Sachs,
creating the quite large internet deceptions about the material that
is being banned.
Many other people on the web, have repeated the false material in an
escalating cycle, or posted or e-mailed abuse about Dr Sachs after
reading Wikipedia or some other tainted source.
This is now
moderating in recent weeks, as some of the corporate media material
attacking Dr Sachs has been withdrawn by media companies who are
trying, belatedly, to minimize their liabilities.
After all, to assist any government, even the US government, in
helping to possibly murder a dissident journalist, is technically a
crime of 'terrorism'.
It is still a crime of 'terrorism' if it is the
USA regime itself who is guilty.
Now, European investigators, who are not under the thumb of the US or
UK companies or the US government, are currently preparing better
journalism about this case, in contrast to the quite misleading
articles which have been on the web.
Journalists are now examining
the proof documents, that no US journalist has so far wished to see.
Proof documents from the upcoming UK court case, will soon be going
online.
Extensive interviews are underway with Dr Sachs and his
people, and also with the various media companies and lawyers and US
government officials involved in attacks against him and in the
banning of his writings.
In the meantime, it is suggested that one read the text of the e-mail
below, "Correcting the internet lies told about Dr Les Sachs (Dr
Leslie Sachs) and about the legal cases involving Patricia Cornwell",
and contrast this with any material currently visible on the web.
For those who wish to investigate on their own, in addition to the
web journalism as can be seen on the banned website below, Dr Sachs
makes available thousands of pages of evidence files which will be
submitted in the British courts, to anyone who will cover the copying
and shipping.
The banned-and-blocked websites of Dr Sachs, as can be found below,
contain links to contact Dr Sachs, who welcomes public enquiries.
How to access the banned journalism of Dr Les Sachs:
It is important to note that the orders against Google and the search
engines, include orders to ban web pages that even dare to link to Dr
Sachs, so be sure to avoid placing any direct html link if you
discuss Dr Sachs' writing on the web.
- Even this web page you are
reading might be blocked from Google and the search engines, if a
direct link was placed here.
There are several websites with the banned material, but you can
reach all of them via the main website of Dr Les Sachs in Belgium:
www (point) dr-les-sachs (point) be (Do NOT put as direct link, or
this page may be blocked!)
Note that the domain suffix is 'be' (for Belgium) instead of 'com',
and those are hyphens within the web address, rather than underscores.
Also, US residents take note, that residents of the USA who have
tried to write or blog in a positive way about Dr Sachs, have
reported direct intimidation by lawyers connected to the friends of
President Bush, with suggestions to remove the material, or else face
a fate perhaps similar to Dr Sachs.
As it seems that US lawyers are too frightened to represent Dr Sachs
or to oppose the banning of his writings, US lawyers may also be too
afraid to assist anyone in the US who is intimidated for trying to
speak positively about him.
So, to protect yourself, do consider the dangers if you are inside
United States territory, before you comment publicly against the
attackers of Dr Sachs.
List of major writings of Dr Les Sachs, banned and blocked from
Google and the search engines:
From the main page of Dr Les Sachs' website as above, links are
provided near the top of the main page there, to a number of these
banned-and-blocked writings.
The banning orders served upon Google and the search engines, are not
always in perfect operation, as various people continue to try and
link and suggest Dr Sachs' banned journalism, so sometimes the banned
material does pop up in search results.
Also, Dr Sachs allows all of his website journalism and content to be
freely republished by anyone, under the broadest kind of 'Creative
Commons' licence, and some people have been republishing the banned-
and-blocked material, trying to make it visible in other places.
Here, a list of the major important journalism pieces by Dr Les Sachs
read and passed around by others.
Amid the evidence to be submitted
in the British courts, are hundreds of e-mails from people, attesting
to how valuable this journalism has been to many people's lives,
especially victims or families of victims of the US legal system.
From this list of the banned-and-blocked journalism of Dr Sachs, you
can already see evidence of falsehood of the US-UK media articles
which attacked Dr Sachs.
- Those articles often suggest that the
banning of Dr Sachs' journalism, was principally 'harassment'
or 'cyberstalking' of the Bush family friend, political financier and
right-wing author Patricia Cornwell.
But as you can see, most of the banned journalism is not even about
this Patricia Cornwell.
And the biography of Patricia Cornwell that
was banned - the biography that was labelled by US judges as
allegedly 'cyberstalking' - is itself backed by a bibliography of
other suppressed articles - a bibliography which the US judges also
banned - and by a set of evidence files, establishing substantial if
not complete truth for the banned biography.
It appears on the face of things, that the 'harassment of Cornwell'
story broadcast by corporate media companies, was a deceptive ruse to
try and discredit a journalist with a wide-ranging critique of US
judicial corruption, who had become a significant figure in the US
resistance movements.
Just below, a list of the banned-and-blocked journalism of Dr Les
Sachs, free for anyone to republish, via links at the banned-and-
blocked website above, as Dr Sachs says, "What the USA is now
illegally trying to block the world from finding on the internet":
The "Complete Underground Guide and FAQ, to US Judicial and Legal
Corruption" (free online book)
"America's Corrupt Legal System - Danger to Visitors, Travellers as
Well as USA Residents"
"Americans Murdering Their Judges, and the American Crisis of
Judicial Corruption"
An article that perhaps changed the US Supreme Court, possibly
blocking J.
Harvie Wilkinson III from becoming Chief Justice: "Judge
J.
Harvie Wilkinson III, His Bribery Cover-Up for 4th Circuit Judges
and Bush Friend Patricia Cornwell"
Detailed Biography of Dr Les Sachs - the banned story of how the US
regime and Bush judges forced Dr Sachs to become a political refugee
in Europe
"The CIA and Wikipedia" - Wikipedia and Answers-com, described as
tools of US government disinformation
The Banned Biography - "The True Early Life and Career of Author
Patricia Cornwell: Crimes & Scandals of a Friend of Bush, Anti-
Semite, and Far-Right Political Financier"
(Note: Lawyers for Patricia Cornwell are currently being extensively
queried about the above biography of their client.
It appears that
Cornwell's lawyers now do not attempt to deny that this biography is
fact-based and truthful, even though they were able to induce US
judges to ban it from Google and the search engines as part of their
2007 efforts to silence Dr Sachs.
On the sidebar of this biography of Patricia Cornwell, there is also
a link to a banned "Bibliography of articles about Patricia Cornwell
that the media are now trying to hide from you", media articles about
Cornwell that were generally suppressed from the internet after 1998,
in what appears as if some sort of implicit 'agreement' among the
media companies, Cornwell and the US political elite.
Most of Dr Sachs' banned biography of Cornwell, is supported by the
articles in the banned 'Bibliography' .
These print media articles now
largely excluded from the internet, but can be secured more
laboriously in print or photocopy versions.
)
More banned-and-blocked writing of Dr Sachs that can be found via the
banned website above:
"Footsteps of Anne Frank": US writer of Jewish heritage forced to
take political refuge in Europe
US Appeals Court filing of 3 April 2004 - composed in hiding inside
the US, before Dr Sachs escaped over the border - An 125-count court
filing served up as high as the Supreme Court of the United States,
but apparently never answered, detailing alleged crimes of US federal
judges with Bush's financier friend Patricia Cornwell
Once again, to access the above writings,
There are several websites with the banned material, but you can
reach all of them via the main website of Dr Les Sachs in Belgium:
www (point) dr-les-sachs (point) be (Do NOT put as direct link, or
this page may be blocked!)
Note that the domain suffix is 'be' (for Belgium) instead of 'com',
and those are hyphens within the web address, rather than underscores.
Also, journalism of Dr Les Sachs on MWC News:
An alternative news service based in Canada, MWC News ("Media with
Conscience") , has been brave enough to continue to publish several
articles from Dr Sachs despite the intimidation of the rather large
media attack campaign conducted against Dr Sachs during 2007.
The
online MWC articles of Dr Sachs are as follows:
"Foreign Companies Face Risk of US Court Corruption: Doing Business
in the Big Bribery Nation"
"US Government Attacks on Jews, versus the Power of the US 'Jewish
Lobby'"
"BBC Showing
Saddam Snuff Video - The Darkest Propaganda Game of All"
Before believing other material about Dr Sachs on the internet - an
alternative viewpoint
There is little accurate journalism on the web yet about the eight-
year-old battle of Patricia Cornwell to silence Dr Les Sachs, because
the US-UK media companies that published many articles, mostly in
2007, were largely tied to Cornwell herself and her far-flung
publishing operation, even a law professor working for Cornwell's
publisher Pearson.
None of these companies wished to look at Dr Sachs' proof documents,
and the media producing these articles not only largely avoided
interviewing Dr Sachs, in some cases they refused all communications
with him.
It should be noted again, that the US and UK corporate media have now
begun a process of withdrawing previously published articles which
were attacking Dr Sachs.
Comprehensive interviews are now being conducted in anticipation of
the upcoming legal proceeding in Britain, including detailed
evaluation of the proof documents, and interview questions served on
all parties, with ample opportunity for all parties to respond.
Pending more thorough journalism on this matter, here is a statement
from Dr Les Sachs, which may be usefully contrasted with other
internet presentations on the topic.
It is suggested that readers
would read below, and glance at Dr Sachs' banned websites, before
accepting at face value some other internet 'summary' claiming to
portray this controversy.
The following was received by e-mail from Dr Sachs, and represents
his own point of view - Dr Sachs himself invites contact, e-mail is
via a link at his (banned) website as described above, or also below
at the bottom:
Correcting the internet lies told about Dr Les Sachs (Dr Leslie
Sachs) and about the legal cases involving Patricia Cornwell -
A statement by Dr Les Sachs
Many of the things, indeed most everything, that you read on the
internet about me, and about the Patricia Cornwell legal cases in the
US, are a lie and a fraud, and the lies and fraud will be brought out
in an upcoming legal case in a few months in the UK.
Thousands of pages of proof documents which show that what I have
been saying is true, will be entered into the record in the UK
courts. Most of these documents are available to anyone.
As we get closer to the UK court date, media companies have begun to
pull back and withdraw some of the stories telling lies about me.
But
many of the lies still remain.
The US judges have illegally banned from Google and the search
engines, nearly all of my own articles and journalism, but also most
articles that link to me or which tell the truth about me.
- The US
government and judges, believe that my journalism is such a threat to
them, that they need to take direct political control of Google and
the search engines, to try and erase my writings, and to make it
easier for me to be murdered.
It is because I am such an important dissident and critic of the US
regime - because my writings have touched many thousands of families
hurt by the US legal system - that the US judges and government, and
the US-UK media companies, have joined to ban my words, and have
joined in what UK legal papers call the largest smear campaign of
lies ever conducted against a political refugee.
That is why they have banned my journalism from the internet.
Most of
the articles and journalism they have banned, are not even about
Patsy Cornwell - The journalism they have banned, is mostly about the
corruption of US judges and lawyers and media companies.
Though the case was started, in order to silence and block me from
writing journalism about the political financier Cornwell, about her
crimes with the Bushes and her crimes with US judges.
Because I hold proof of serious crimes by US federal judges, US
lawyers were afraid to help me.
US lawyers are often disbarred if
they dare to say a word to help a victim of the judges' hatred.
First, some true things about me, that most internet articles hide
from you -
- The threats to jail and murder me by the US judges and government,
forced me to be a political refugee from the US.
I escaped to safety
in Europe in 2004, and I am now an EU citizen.
- In the US, the judges banned my freedom of speech instantly, in a
phone call from the federal judge, minutes after I received the legal
papers.
No trial, no hearing, no nothing, just an illegal deal
arranged in advance by the corrupt Willcox & Savage firm, lawyers for
Bush's friend Cornwell, in a deal with a judge appointed by Bush.
-
Apparently the only such case in US history, instant banning of
journalism and freedom of speech, advance injunction without trial or
hearing.
- They used the ban on my speaking, to threaten to torture me to
death in a US jail cell, and to stage a brief Stalin-style 'legal
proceeding', with me banned from denouncing it as a fraud.
- Friends of the US judge pretended to be my lawyers.
While
threatening to have me tortured and killed, these lawyers signing
fake papers claiming I "agreed" to ban my freedom of speech for the
rest of my life, plus "agreed" to spend the rest of my life paying
money to the judge's friends.
These friends of the judge, also
pretended to be part of a 'Freedom Works Foundation' which doesn't
exist, and even put this fraud in writing.
- Patricia Cornwell is a friend of the Bush family for 25 years.
When
the first Bush was President, they made Cornwell into a 'famous
author' as a way for media companies to funnel millions back to the
Bush family.
- Cornwell has been a special 'friend of the judges' since 1998.
Media companies at that time also agreed to begin to hide the real
facts of Cornwell's life, and to join the US judges to help destroy
anyone who writes truth about her.
- Cornwell threatened to destroy the books of a Jew, in writing, and
then committed perjury about it.
It is Cornwell's threats of book-
burning against a Jew, that started the public controversy between
myself and Cornwell.
- Cornwell publicly boasted in Vanity Fair magazine that she can get
away with murdering people, and I am one of the people she has
enjoyed threatening to murder.
- In 2007, after three years of my journalism about US court
corruption, the same US judges who threatened to kill me and who
forced me to become a refugee in Europe, these same judges held a new
fake 'trial', in part to smear me with brand new lies claiming I was
a 'stalker' of Bush's friend Cornwell, but mostly in order to issue
illegal orders upon Google and the search engines, to ban most of my
journalism from the internet, so people cannot find my writings.
- The majority of my writing banned from the internet, is not even
about Cornwell, it is rather about the corrupt US legal system and
judges.
These banned writings have been important to tens of
thousands of people.
The US government seeks to have me silenced and
murdered to prevent this journalism being more widely known.
Some big lies and hoaxes about me, that you find on the internet -
- The lie that the case is about 'plagiarism'
I never used this word in accusations about my writing and
Cornwell's.
The fake story about 'plagiarism' is a set of words
shoved into my mouth, to distract from the facts about Cornwell's
threats of book-burning a Jew's books, Cornwell then hiring people to
extort me and threaten to kill me, and to illegally ban my journalism
and freedom of speech.
- The 'sticker on my book' discussed in news
articles, spoke only of Cornwell's book-burning threats, not
about 'plagiarism' .
- The lie that I am a 'stalker' or 'cyber-stalker' harassing Cornwell
From 2004-2007 I published three years of factual journalism about
Cornwell and the US judges, proven by documents, and totally
unchallenged by Cornwell's lawyers.
- Then, Cornwell's new corrupt
lawyers at Morris & Morris in Richmond, and their partner corrupt
lawyers at WilmerHale in Boston, just invented fake 'stalker' stories
out of thin air, and spread these false stories through media
companies tied to Cornwell and the US government.
Today, Cornwell's
lawyers don't even deny the stalking charges are fake, because
the 'stalking' stories Cornwell has invented are literally
impossible - Cornwell says I have been sneaking back into the USA,
somehow evading Homeland Security at the borders, just to 'stalk'
her, and then I am able to sneak back to Europe, ha!
- The lie that I "agreed" to ban my own freedom of speech as
a "settlement"
I have been an anti-corruption book author and journalist since the
early 1980s.
- The written order banning my freedom of speech for the
rest of my life, is a clear fraud, only signed by the judge's
friends, not by me.
- I had no assets to lose by going to trial or
appealing illegal orders.
- No one in the Cornwell gang can explain
why I had any reason to quickly "agree" to ban my own freedom of
speech and journalism for the rest of my life, plus "agree" to have
my publishing company and reputation destroyed, plus "agree" to spend
the rest of my life paying several hundred thousand dollars to the
judge's friends with their fake 'civil rights foundation' that
doesn't exist.
- These lawyers even joked, on the written court
record, about threatening to murder me, and about conspiring with the
federal judge to pose as my lawyer while they were really working for
Cornwell. - Yes, ha, very funny.
- The Cornwell group has also
circulated fake 'apology letters' created by Cornwell's lawyers.
- The lie that my journalism is for 'marketing' my books, or that I
am 'jealous' of Cornwell
This is more absurdity.
The initial claim of Cornwell and that the
judges is that there is nothing wrong with threatening to burn a
Jew's books, and that I was only saying this to 'market' my own
writing, thus I must be banned and suppressed.
They claim that US
judges can ban any independent journalism, merely by declaring that
the journalist is 'marketing' and selling his writing.
- They claim
that I am only showing proof documents of how they illegally banned
my journalism, of how they committed court fraud and threatened to
murder me, of how they destroyed my publishing career, how they
forced me to become a political refugee in Europe to save my life -
just because I am engaged in 'marketing' or 'jealous'. Yeah, sure.
- The lie that Cornwell doesn't hate Jews
Documents and witnesses prove that Patricia Cornwell really does hate
the people she describes as "dirty, filthy Jews".
Cornwell grew up
under the foster care supervision of Billy Graham, whose anti-Semitic
hatred was recorded on the Watergate tapes.
Like some Nazis, Cornwell
likes using submissive Jews for business, or in her eroticism.
Cornwell's gay marriage to a Jewish woman seems a political fake,
taken under legal advice, to cover for crimes: Victims of Cornwell
have had swastikas painted on houses, Cornwell's friends record her
hatred of 'filthy Jews', and Cornwell did, in writing, threaten a
book-burning of the books of a Jew, and then paid people to threaten
murder to cover up for this.
Internet media sources are mostly tied to Cornwell -
Do note how many internet "sources" turn out to be Patricia
Cornwell's own publishing companies or others with a vested interest
in her crimes.
CNN is a branch of one of Cornwell's publishing companies, Time-
Warner Books.
AP (Associated Press) is partly owned by Cornwell's publishing
companies, and by parties named as co-defendants of Cornwell in past-
crimes (Times-Dispatch Media General).
David Mehegan, Boston Globe (New York Times Company) sent me hate
mail, does not deny taking a bribe from Cornwell's Boston lawyer Joan
Lukey.
The UK Guardian is in joint financial projects with Cornwell's
publishers at Pearson and elsewhere.
Media General - Times Dispatch editorial board had a personal meeting
with Cornwell, agreeing to help her in any way whatsoever, due to the
money she gives the Bushes.
US law prof.
Roy Girasa, works for Cornwell's publisher Pearson,
doesn't deny he took money to write lies for Cornwell.
Wikipedia and Answers-com are defendants in the UK legal case, facing
possible closure, they have a vested interested in supporting the
banning of my journalism and the threats to murder me, after they
worked with Cornwell and the CIA to spread lies about me for several
years.
Wikipedia's UK spokesman David Gerard has sent me personal
hate mail, telling me how he is working to destroy me.
Media companies that operate in the US fear revenge by US judges in
future cases, if they expose crimes by the judges - media companies
want favours from US judges, so they help the US judges to attack and
smear critics of the courts.
The US federal judges, anxious to cover up for their court fraud
crimes, as partners of Cornwell and Bush, of course wrote extensive
public lies and smears about me as part of their illegal 'court
orders', while banning my responses and my websites from Google and
the search engines.
Patricia Cornwell has spread lies about me to readers of her books,
encouraging them to spread smears about me on the internet, while her
judge friends ban my replies from being visible on Google and the
search engines.
And of course you have various other people who never contacted me,
writing their own false material on the internet, based on lies
originally written by the Cornwell team or the Cornwell judges, and
spread through Cornwell's media connections above.
Feel free to share or publish the above with anyone you wish.
(Note that on the internet my name might be given either as Dr Les
Sachs, also Dr Leslie Sachs - people sell used copies of my old
published books on Amazon or Half-dot-com usually under the
name 'Leslie Sachs').
Dr Les Sachs
website:
www (dot) dr-les-sachs (dot) be (Do NOT put as direct link, or this
page may be blocked!)
(The above e-mail received from Dr Les Sachs, is the conclusion of
this article.
)
-- Dan Hajidah
- About Dan Hajidah -
Abdan "Dan" Hajidah is a contract researcher for journalists at
European news agencies.
He has supplied documented source material to
journalists at leading news sources in Europe.
Dan shares most of his time among several countries of Northern
Europe - Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium and Sweden.
Dan is particularly interested in the role of progressive Muslim
culture in modern European life, and issues of freedom of expression
that affect the Muslim community.
Dan can be reached by e-mail at: dh-news @ europe.com
===
US Government Attacks on Jews
Versus the Power of the US "Jewish Lobby"
Political Views
By Dr Les Sachs
http://mwcnews.net/content/view/12782/254/
Anti-semitic attacks by Bush's friends and the US government? - But
what about the "powerful US Jewish lobby" backing "total US support
for Israel"?
As people read my writings, and learn about the anti-semitic attacks
on me by Bush's friends and some Jew-hating US judges, I often get
comments or questions along these lines -
"It's hard to believe the anti-semite angle given all the protection
the US and Bush are known for giving Israel, and the power of the
Jewish lobby in the United States - So how is it possible that you
can be the victim of anti-semitic attacks, and be forced to leave the
US and take refuge in Europe, when it seems like the Jewish lobby
would have jumped in eagerly to protect you?"
Very sadly, it shows the power of propaganda, that this kind of
question ends up being asked.
The reality - which Jews themselves know well - is that Jews are
often afraid to help Jewish victims of government attacks, because
Jews everywhere, even wealthy Jews in the US, tend to be very afraid
of the world around them.
Today in the US, as in much of history,
Jews will cower behind the curtains of one house, when the
authorities come to attack and destroy the Jews next door.
Moreover, some Jews will even rob and betray other Jews, as well as
abandon them and refuse to help them.
Every nation, society or tribe
has its quislings, who are ready to betray their fellows.
Jews are no
different.
People speak of the power of the "Jewish lobby" to denote the
political figures maintaining the connections between the US military-
industrial complex and the Israeli government.
There are indeed Jews
who are prominent alongside Bush and other US politicians, there are
Jews who work for the US government system, and other Jews who
collaborate with it - just as many people of all backgrounds
collaborate with the US regime.
But there are also Jews who really take the rebellious Jewish
heritage seriously, Jews who dare to speak out, and such Jews can
find themselves much hated by the US rulers, exactly because they can
be effective voices against the fascism and denial of human rights in
the US.
Jews can be very powerful if they point out Nazi-like
behaviour among the US ruling class.
Such people of Jewish heritage,
are the kind of Jews that the US would like to see silenced,
marginalised, or banned, and if they don't keep quiet, even killed
and exterminated.
There are already political Jews being murdered in US jail cells,
people of Jewish heritage attacked by the US government (like myself)
who can't get help from Jewish lawyers or organizations.
And that is
all hidden beneath the surface of stories about the "all-powerful
Jewish lobby" and "military support for Israel".
Consider the theory of the "powerful Jewish lobby" as showing its
strength in the US military backing of the government of Israel.
This
theory needs to be analysed - and actually, as will be shown below,
this theory is rather a kind of reverse mirror of a more complex and
more frightening truth.
But even if you take the "powerful Jewish lobby" theory at face
value, you can see how the "powerful Jewish organisations" might want
to still keep silent about the attack and killing of individual
Jewish people, ESPECIALLY when it is the US government attacking a
Jew.
Jews might well be afraid to damage that precious "military support
for Israel".
They may think it necessary to stay quiet about innocent
Jews getting attacked or murdered by the US government, as
a "necessary sacrifice" for the larger scheme of things.
And the whole prominent program of "US military support for Israel"
is the perfect cover story - it actually makes the US an ideal place
to attack and kill Jews, because "no one will believe it".
In today's world, as with any other victim, so long as the attack on
a Jew is not trumpeted in the mass corporate media, on CNN or the BBC
or by the "major" Jewish organisations, an attack on a Jew may well
remain nearly anonymous.
A Jew today can be murdered in near-silence,
like so many other victims in today's tragic world.
I myself have heard from victims, such as family of a political Jew
quietly killed in US jail cells.
There is no "big media" telling
their story, and so their stories remain, like much of the truth
today, hidden from most of the world.
The "Jewish lobby" - different from the "Christian lobby", the "Saudi
lobby" etc.
?
Let's go back and look again at the basic question asked above -
"It's hard to believe the anti-semite angle given all the protection
the US and Bush are known for giving Israel, and the power of the
Jewish lobby in the United States - So how is it possible that you
can be the victim of anti-semitic attacks, and be forced to leave the
US and take refuge in Europe, when it seems like the Jewish lobby
would have jumped in eagerly to protect you?"
As one reflects on this question, one realises it's actually a bit
silly.
The assumption behind this inquiry - an assumption that is
itself the creation of anti-semitic propaganda - is the mistake of
thinking of "the Jews" as some kind of monolithic bloc all together -
the Jews in Israel along with the Jews "running America", etc.
Actually, Jews in Israel and in the US are not just very diverse, but
extremely divided.
Jews are extremely contentious, and hardly united at all.
Many Jews
scorn the whole lot of Israeli politicians.
Many Jews would like
immediate, unrestricted peace negotiations, and quick comprehensive
peace agreements, between Israel and the Palestinians and all
neighbouring states.
Both around the world and inside Israel itself, there are a
significant number of religious Jews who think the state of Israel
should not even exist, unless the Messiah himself were to establish
it.
Despite the drumbeats of an upcoming Iran-Israel military
conflict, there are tens of thousands of Jews content to live in
Iran, and there are other Jews who travel to Tehran to express their
compliments to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
It is important to digest all of this - the real diversity of the
Jewish and Israeli peoples, versus the corporate media focus on the
US-Israeli government powers.
The knee-jerk thinking, about the monolithic Jewish bloc, is really
the end-product of all those anti-semitic stories of "rich Jews
always working together and trying to take over the world".
But in
reality, Israel today has an enormous chunk of its population in
poverty, a shameful gap between rich and poor - and there are many
poor Jews in the US as well as around the planet.
Here's another way to look at the question we are analysing, about
the "power of the Jewish lobby".
Imagine the case of a US citizen of
white Christian Protestant heritage, who is also a victim of US legal
and political corruption, who has been attacked by the US government.
Would anyone think of saying to this person:
"I really doubt your story of US legal corruption . . .
After all,
aren't those judges and lawyers and politicians you criticise, other
American white Christians, just like your own heritage? Isn't the US
government totally controlled by white Christians - like Bush and
most US senators and judges? So how could they be attacking YOU?"
One of the "most powerful lobbies" in Washington is indeed the lobby
of well-funded Christians - does that stop the US government from
attacking people who take Christian principles seriously?
Has the "powerful Christian lobby" stopped the US government from
allowing the attacks upon, and practical extermination of, Christian
communities in Iraq? - The "Christian lobby" says very little about
these events, and doesn't do much to help these Christian victims -
and yet Washington is full of famous Christian preachers with lots of
money, who are often at the White House or in Congress speaking
directly with US leaders.
Another "powerful lobby" is that of Saudi Arabia, the country that is
the very guardian of the central holy places of Islam, a
lobby "extremely influential" in Washington, and very close to the
Bushes - does that stop the US government from attacking and jailing
Muslims without trial and taking all of their rights away, from
making war on much of the Islamic world, and from bashing Muslims on
a regular basis in US rhetoric?
One of the most powerful people in Washington under Bush, Attorney
General Alberto R.
Gonzales, is from a Mexican family; he has been a
friend and adviser to Bush for many years - Does that stop the US
government from attacking and bashing Mexicans?
One of the most powerful people in the entire world is President
Bush's Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, a black woman - Does
that stop the US regime from destroying black communities and jailing
more black people than any other nation in the world?
President Bush's friend Patricia Cornwell is a multi-millionaire
lesbian who brings her lesbian girlfriends to party at President
Bush's Kennebunkport estate, while giving Bush and various senators
millions of dollars in gifts and campaign money.
US Vice President
Cheney's daughter is lesbian, and President Bush has often had a gay
prostitute at the White House (Jeff Gannon - James Guckert), with
Bush himself commonly thought to be a bi-sexual - Does that all stop
the US government, or even the Bush crowd, from attacking and bashing
gay people as part of their political programme?
So despite the "Jewish lobby" associated with the US defence industry
and politicians, why is it somehow "surprising" that US officials
would also attack Jews, as they also attack all of the above
categories of people, too - while every one of them also
has "powerful representatives" close to President Bush and the other
US rulers?
About
We are serious about your spiritual/physical health & well being~~~
Thank you for joining and adding value to the quest of the meaning of life/chayim
~Shalom/Welcome to SHEKINAH~LIFE'¬ Your hosts Jim and Terry Hamilton
B"H.
As The Zohar itself proclaims: "Woe unto those who see in the Law nothing but simple narratives and ordinary words .... Every word of the Law contains an elevated sense and a sublime mystery .... The narratives of the Law are but the raiment within which it is swathed."
Shalom to one and all/.....Your host:
Jim and Terry
http://ShekinahLife.ning.com/m (mobile)\
TZEDAKAH / donations
SHALOM ALEICHEM
join us here Shekinah~Life
Leaving Comments: The Comments section of ShekinahLife-is provided in the interests of free speech only.
It is mostly moderated, however comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying-and-or-spamming stand a chance of being edited or deleted
Enjoy your Journey~"Y&T"
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
Rose sharon -shekinahlife
In the beginning of the "Zohar" the Article, the Rose,..it says: "Just as the rose among thorns is…
© 2025 Created by James and Terry Hamilton.
Powered by
