What do we have to look forward to now that Obama is President of the US ?

[Mrs. Sharon B. Hodge]

The American people voted or change, and now Obama will give it to them.


Will Obama “Change” The Bush Police State Or Expand It?

Alex Jones


Will Obama “Change” The Bush Police State Or Expand It?

Now that Barack Obama has become the 44th President of the United States we offer a challenge - will those who elected him be able to progress past their fawning idolatry and actually pressure Obama to deliver on his mandate of “change,” or will the architecture of the Bush police state remain in place while the American empire expands?

http://www. prisonplanet. com/will-obama-change-the-bush-police-sta...

Will Obama “Change” The Bush Police State Or Expand It?

Will liberals go back to sleep now the “messiah” has arrived?



Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet. com
Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Now that Barack Obama has become the 44th President of the United States we offer a challenge - will those who elected him be able to progress past their fawning idolatry and actually pressure Obama to deliver on his mandate of “change,” or will the architecture of the Bush police state remain in place while the American empire expands?

Obama’s acceptance speech assertion that “change has come to America” is likely to signal the beginning and end of the “change” that millions of Americans naively thought they were voting for.


That’s it folks, the puppet has been rotated. Sorry to be so cynical, but the “change” you thought you were electing is already over and done with. The color of his skin matters about as much as whether he has an R or a D next to his name. The egregious spending will continue, government will balloon in size, American soldiers will be used as cannon fodder for more interventionist wars of the military-industrial complex, U.S. citizens will continue to have their phone calls tapped and their rights curtailed, and the Federal Reserve will continue to rule the financial system with an iron fist while the middle class is squeezed out of existence.


How can Obama claim that “change has come to America” when he hasn’t even set foot in the White House? What specifically has Obama promised to change beside his plan to redecorate the White House?

It seems that a lot of the truthers and activists, as well as the liberal left, seem to have forgotten that the responsibility to “change” America rests with the American people. As Gandhi said, we have to be the change we want to see in the world.


Obama is no messiah, he is a representative, a public servant, for those that elected him into office.
Will those that voted for him in the name of changing eight years of Bush administration malfeasance hold his feet to the fire and demand the repeal of the American police state that Bush has crafted, or will they simply go back to sleep and consider their work done simply because another Democrat is in office?

The majority of liberals gleefully supported or simply ignored the bombing of Serbia and the genocidal sanctions against Iraq because of the cult of personality built up around Bill Clinton.
Will Obama be another ideologue for the left to associate their power with or will they actually demand that he restore America to the Constitution? Will the left ninny and obsess about non-issues like gay marriage and welfare programs while allowing the Bush police state to remain in place?

Remember, the Democrats were handed the Congress and the Senate in 2006 with a mandate for change. What has changed since that time? Nothing whatsoever. American troops are still in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Patriot Act is still in place, phone calls are still being tapped and war criminals who committed impeachable offences still go free.


But in an attempt to avoid being labeled “right-wing racists” and all manner of spurious labels now being carelessly heaped upon anyone who doesn’t follow the herd and bow down at the feet of Lord Obama, we’re going to remain constructive and set Obama, and by extension those that voted for him, some challenges to bring real “change” to America and restore the country to the Constitution and the ideals of the Founders that Obama mentioned in his speech last night.


Let’s be generous and give Obama the whole four years of his initial term to make significant progress on the following issues. Here are some questions about “change” that we are going to be keeping track of until 2012.


- Will Obama repeal Patriot Acts I and II as well as reversing Bush’s signing statement and acknowledging the repeal of the John Warner Defense Authorization Act?

- Will Obama support Dennis Kucinich’s efforts to bring war crimes charges against Bush, Cheney and others for deceiving the country into a war or will he protect them against such charges like Nancy Pelosi has done?

- Will Obama bring war crimes charges against Bush, Cheney and others for authorizing torture and will the torture of suspects under U.S.
detention, a complete violation of both the Constitution and the Geneva Conventions, cease under an Obama administration?

- Will Obama withdraw American troops from Iraq and Afghanistan without sending them away again to bomb another broken-backed third world country in the name of a UN-supported “humanitarian” war?

- Will Obama end the warrantless secret surveillance and phone-taps of American citizens?

- Will Obama follow through on his rhetorical support for the second amendment or will he seek to ban guns as he did in Illinois?

- Will Obama cease his support for the Bush-administration backed banker bailouts, hated by the majority of Americans, and target the real cause of the problem - the Federal Reserve - or will he continue to give taxpayers’ money to banks who are merely hoarding it all for themselves?

- Will Obama seek to continue the militarization of America and preparations for martial law through Northcom and the secret government or will he dismantle the police state that has been constructed over the last eight years by the Bush administration?

There can be no excuses - either Obama will be proven to be a liar or he will, backed by Democratic control of Congress and the Senate, follow through on his mandate for “change”.


People like Congressman Ron Paul are too long in the tooth and have watched too many political campaigns to glibly jump on the bandwagon of political platitudes.


Those caught up in Obama fever who would have otherwise voted for Ron Paul should heed the warnings of Dr. No.


As the coming of the new messiah drew closer, Paul had some sobering reminders for a CNN audience last night, pointing out that Obama will not cut spending, government will get bigger and more intrusive, foreign policy will remain the same and unpopular financial bailouts will continue.


We hope we are wrong, but forgive us for our cynicism, because whatever has emerged from the two-party monopoly in the past has always proven to be the problem - not the solution.





Obama's Advisor STARTED FEMA Camps...Watch Him Closely


Zbigniew Brzezinski FOUNDED FEMA 'COG' Continuity Of Government in case US faces imminent catastrophic event... and you are all about to get ROUNDED UP, QUARRANTINED, TAGGED, and EXECUTED BY FEMA when some 'national emergency' occurs bringing martial law and US gets taken over by COG Continuity of Government which means REX-84 FEMA will be the EMERGENCY GOVERNMENT OF THE LAND

Brzezinski: Obama Will Face “Imminent” Foreign Policy Problems - Tr...


USA PUPPET The Iranian Shah (replacing the democratically elected Mohammed Mosaddeq who was overthrown by CIA) meeting with President Carter, and National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski (NOW BARACK OBAMA's ADVISOR AND PUPPET MASTER) 1977 - Nope Mr Carter is NOT A NICE GUY EITHER he signed the Global 2000 mass depopulation planning - Georgia Guidestones anyone?


What’s FEMA’s role when US gets struck by say, an ASTEROID?


We Are Change Confronts Brzezinski (2007)


REX-84 FEMA secret planning so clandestine not even Congress is allowed to ask


Why did FEMA purchased hundreds of thousands of PLASTIC CASKETS

***********************************
FEMA's structure for fascist rule
***********************************

By Kathleen Klenetsky and Herbert Quinde

http://www. hackcanada. com/blackcrawl/patriot/national_emergency_0...

"You have an authoritarian structure. . .
with FEMA"

--Harold Relyea, chief specialist on presidential directives at the
Congressional Research Service, in an interview with EIR

The Federal Emergency Management Agency was founded during the
presidency of one Trilateral Commission member, Jimmy Carter, and it
seems increasingly likely that its fundamental purpose -- to seize
control of the reins of government through emergency fiat -- will be
realized under the presidency of another, George Bush

The Trilateral link is no accident Together with the other leading
Eastern Establishment think tank, the New York Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR), the Trilateral Commission effectively brought FEMA
into existence

The leading theoreticians behind the creation of FEMA were Samuel
Huntington, a National Security Council consultant under Carter, and
Zbigniew Brzezinski, who served as Carter's national security advisor
Before that, Brzezinski was executive director at the Trilateral
Commission, a "New Ager" who envisioned a "technetronic society" in
the United States Nominally a Democrat, Brzezinski nevertheless
became a leading adviser on strategic policy to George Bush's 1988
campaign, and continues to serve as an informal consultant to the Bush
administration Huntington is currently a member of the FEMA Advisory
Board.
Both Huntington and Brzezinski belong to the CFR

FEMA was established in March 1979 by presidential Review Memorandum
32, with the mandate to maintain "the continuity of government" (COG)
during a national security emergency. PRM 32 bypassed the U.
S
Constitution, and awarded power to the _unelected_ officials at the
National Security Council to direct U.
S government operations by
emergency decree By placing FEMA under the NSC's control, Huntington,
Brzezinski, et al, turning the NSC into a shadow technocratic
dictatorship, waiting for a real or manufactured crisis to seize
control of the country

Although FEMA was sold to Congress and the public as the vehicle
through which the United States could mount an adequate, centralized
response to natural and other disasters, the agency has consistently
failed to fulfill that purpose In its last major interventions, in
1989's San Francisco earthquake and Hurricane Hugo, FEMA's ineptness
and bungling enraged disaster victims and local officials FEMA was
more interested in psychologically profiling the population's response
to the disasters, than it was in assisting their physical survival
That was typical of FEMA's 10-year record, which began with its
panic-mongering handling of the Three Mile Island nuclear accident in
1979

Burying the Constitution

FEMA has proven by it's own actions that it is not a disaster
preparedness agency Its true purpose is found in the 1970s policy
decisions of the CFR and the Trilateral Commission, decisions which
ushered in the "post-industrial society" and "limits to growth" era
which brought the United States into the current depression

It is clear from viewing these policy decisions, that the
Establishment had made a conscious decision to deal with economic
contraction and concomitant social unrest by resorting to fascist
emergency rule and other forms of "fascism with a democratic face"


Now Even An America But Born In Africa

So now, go cheer for the first New World Order president of the dead USA



***************************************
ELECTION 2008
Will Supreme Court have say in presidency?
Schedule includes campaign response to questions on Obama birthplace
***************************************

Posted: November 04, 2008
6:51 pm Eastern

© 2008 WorldNetDaily

U.S. Supreme Court Justice David Souter has rejected an emergency appeal for the court to halt the tabulation of the 2008 presidential election results until Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama documents his eligibility to run for the office, according to an attorney who brought the action that challenges the Illinois senator's standing in the race.


However, the issue isn't going away, at least for now, since Souter set a schedule for a response from Obama to the challenge from attorney Philip J. Berg.


As WND reported, Berg brought his claims to the Supreme Court after a federal judge dismissed his lawsuit alleging Obama is ineligible to be president because he possibly was born in Kenya.


The judge concluded Berg lacks standing to bring the action.


The 34-page memorandum that accompanied the court order from Judge R. Barclay Surrick said ordinary citizens can't sue to ensure that a presidential candidate actually meets the constitutional requirements of the office.


Instead, Surrick said Congress could determine "that citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution's eligibility requirements for the Presidency," but that it would take new laws to grant individual citizens that ability.


"Until that time," Surrick says, "voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring.
"

In a statement today, Berg said he was told by a clerk for Souter that his application for an injunction to stay the election was denied. But he also said the defendants "are required to respond to the Writ of Certiorari" by Dec. 1.


The questions over Obama's eligibility first got traction among Internet bloggers and later were heightened when several campaigns were launched to determine whether a "certificate of live birth" posted on the Internet by the Obama campaign was valid.


The issue gained more attention when Berg told radio talk show host Michael Savage he had an admission from Obama's grandmather that she was at his birth – in Kenya.


"This is a question of who has standing to stand up for our Constitution," Berg told Jeff Schreiber of America's Right blog.
"If I don't have standing, if you don't have standing, if your neighbor doesn't have standing to ask whether or not the likely next president of the United States – the most powerful man in the entire world – is eligible to be in that office in the first place, then who does?"

WND senior investigative reporter Jerome Corsi traveled both to Kenya and Hawaii to investigate issues surrounding Obama's birth.


But his discoveries only raised more questions.


The biggest question is why Obama, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists, simply hasn't ordered it made available to settle the rumors.


The governor's office in Hawaii said he had a valid certificate but rejected requests for access and left ambiguous its origin. Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii.


Obama's half-sister, Maya Soetoro, has named two different Hawaii hospitals where Obama could have been born.


But a VIDEO posted on YouTube features Obama's Kenyan grandmother Sarah claiming to have witnessed Obama's birth in Kenya.


http://www. worldnetdaily. com/index. php?fa=PAGE. view&pageId=...


Filling the shoes of the last administration, now Obama steps
into an already primed and ready military state rule.
awaiting to begin Martial Law, and clean up the
dead bodies from orchestrated plague release and
manufactured crisis events.



It's too late now. The fate of America is sealed with Obama ruling the lot.

Terro​rizin​g presi​denti​al campa​igns wont make a diffe​rence​.​.​.​ terro​rists​ withi​n our own gover​nment​ will carry​ thing​s out at will

Will there be any Truth left when it is over?

Devious plans going on in secret to start the killing of citizens.
,br/>
Depopulating the world should be right up Obama's alley
AGENDA 21 - DEPOPULATION 2009 PART 1






AGENDA 21 - DEPOPULATION 2009 PART 2




Another trick of the trade that Obama has been briefed
on and it ready to follow the plan.
Bioweapon pandemics, quarantines, use of military
force, Martial Law all neatly packaged into one.